<

ANZAC Day, a day to remember those who fought for our country.


Those who fought for our country, for our way of life deserve to be remembered. Regardless of how their ideals may have been betrayed by politicians. Support our veterans and service men and women. Not war. People get hurt in war.

ANZAC, Australian and New Zealand Army Corps, did not exist before Gallipoli. Gallipoli, planed and miss executed by Churchill. The way the men fought and died, for a lost cause, created the ANZAC legend.

Australians have volunteered and fought in many wars. As well as peace keeping and peace making operations.


Maori Wars 1860 - 1866 ( for England )
20 died


Sudan 1885 ( for the Empire )
6 died


The Third Anglo-Burmese War 1885 - 1886 ( for the Empire )
1 served


Chitral 1895 ( for the Empire )
1 served


Boer War 1899 - 1902 ( for the Empire )
16,175 served
606 died


Boxer Rebellion 1900 - 1901 ( for the Empire )
556 served
6 died


WWI 1914 - 1918 ( for the Empire )
331,781 served
61,919 died


North Russia Relief Force 1919 ( for the Empire )
120 served


Native uprising in the British Solomon Islands 1927 ( for the Empire )


WWII 1939 - 1945 ( for the Empire )
557,799 served
39,366 died

Project Kingfisher a 1944 - 45 plan for Australian paratroops to rescue some 1,800 Australian prisoners of war held in Sandakan. It was planed and fully resourced by Australia except for the troop carrying aircraft. MacArthur refused to release the aircraft, despite the fact that aircraft were available and idle. Only one of the 1,800 or so Australian prisoners of war survived and returned home.


Korea 1950 - 1953 ( for the UN )
18,059 served
339 died

The first war that the Australian Regular Army fought in.

Operation Commando, the battle of Maryang San. 3 RAR dislodged an enemy, twice it's strength, from entrenched defensive positions, seized that ground and held it. 39 decorations were awarded for actions during this battle.


Malayan Emergency 1950 - 1960 ( for the Empire )
36 died


Vietnam 1962 - 1973 ( US request )
50,190 served
520 died

Long Tan. 11 platoon D company 6 RAR was ambushed by a company. It escalated and A, D and part of B coys 6 RAR forced the Viet Cong 275th Main Force Regiment plus and the D445 Local Force battalion to retreat. Some 230 members of 6 RAR defeated some 2,500 of the enemy, yes about 10:1. The Vietnamese left behind 245 bodies, total Australian casualties 18 dead and 24 wounded.


Indonesian Confrontation 1963 - 1966 ( for the Empire )
16 died


The Gulf 1990 - 1991 ( US led )
959 served

RAN ships are still deployed in the Gulf.


1991 One SASR squadron ( 110 men ) joined some NZ SAS to form the ANZAC SAS Squadron in Kuwait.


Somalia 1992-1994 ( for the UN )
937 served
1 died


1998 110 members of the SASR and the NZ SAS were again deployed to the Gulf - ( Operation Desert Fox )
( ANZAC Special Operations Force detachment on Operation Pollard in Kuwait )


East Timor 1999 - ( Operation Citadel )( Australian initiative )
approximately 440 served at a time.

Aidabasalala. A 6 man SASR patrol was ambushed by more than 20 militiamen. The militia being beaten off with 3 killed and 3 wounded. No Australian casualties.


Afghanistan " The war against terror " 2001 - ( US led )

The SASR has been praised for the success of it's reconnaissances patrols.

US Major General Frank Hagenback, Commander of Coalition Task Force Mountain stated "You won't find a more professional group than the Australians that have served here with us"

Our contribution apparently ended in 2003. However, I believe we are still supporting operations there under  Operation Slipper.

The US invaded Afghanistan to capture bin Laden, who they accuse of planning the ' September 11 ' hijackings. That's right, they invaded a whole country to capture one man after the Taliban refused or were unable to hand him over. But have so far been unsuccessful.

And the US has been critical of Israel's battle against terrorists.

An Australian is still being held, in conditions similar to a 1920s zoo, by the US, it is well over three years now. The US claim the prisoners are probably terrorists and therefore not prisoners of war. However under the Geneva Convention those held who are not considered prisoners of war must be brought before a formal hearing to determine their status, this did not happen until recently. And the tribunals have been suspended, pending US court cases regarding the prisoners' legal status and the fairness of the these tribunals.

Judges around the world have criticized the US for holding these people prisoners. Yet our government is doing nothing about it!

" children are still being interrogated and will continue to be held at Guantanamo. About 660 prisoners are in the camp. They have not been tried or convicted of any offence but are being held as part of what the US calls its war on terror. http://www.abc.net.au/news/justin/nat/newsnat-22apr2003-35.htm

Prisoners that have been released have accused the US of torturing them. These people were held for at least two years, then released without charge. Why were they held in the first place? If they tortured those they have admitted they can't charge, what are they doing to the others they still may charge?

The US may be an ally, but it is not behaving like a friend!


Is it right to fight for ' justice ' when, in doing so, you don't adhere to the principles you are fighting for?


Invasion and occupation of Iraq 2003 ( Operation Bastille & Operation Catalyst )( US bullied )
some 2,600+

Howard's argument for our involvement in this war is summarized thus:

1. Most terrorist organizations want weapons of mass destruction.

2. Iraq has weapons of mass destruction.

Therefore Iraq may supply weapons of mass destruction to terrorists in the future.

Therefore they must be disarmed. But they are not fully cooperating.

Therefore we must invade them.

Sorry, but this logic too tenuous. It's like revoking your driving licence now, because, even though you have never done it before, next year you might drive after drinking.

And weapons of mass destruction have not been found in Iraq. Despite the fact that Colin Powell pointed to air photographs of Iraq and said there were weapons of mass destruction in those specific places. At last the US has now admitted that there weren't any. And the reason for the invasion has been changed, it was now because of the way Sadam treated his people.

The US and UK do have weapons of mass destruction! Seems like a double standard to me.

Another 450 Australians are deploying to Iraq to replace 1,400 troops from the Netherlands. Before our election Howard said there would be no significant increase in our numbers there, this is an approximate 50% increase. Howard does admit that it is a broken election promise ( something like "there will never, ever be a GST" ). He said it was a hard decision, and I'm sure it was.

In an interview on this topic he stated that someone had to replace the troops leaving the area and he did not make the decision to send our troops until after he was asked by Japan and Britain. He also stated that the deployment is in Britain area of responsibility, but they can't deploy more troops because there has to be a British election this year. That's right our troops are going so the British labour government has a better chance of being reelected! And this after he was reelected after promising no significant increase in the number of our troops in Iraq!


As well as the above operations Australian service personnel are constantly involved in peace keeping / peace making operations and always on exchange with the forces of other nations, eg UK, US & NZ. Where they may become involved in operations of their host country eg KFOR.

On the 1st of march 2004 over 1300 Australian soldiers were serving on peacekeeping, peace monitoring, military assistance and other operations around the world.

Our service personnel past and present serve us by protecting us and our country. They also carry out tasks allocated the them by our government. Even though you may not agree with some of the tasks they carryout, they deserve your respect. Especially those who have served in time of war.



http://www.diggerhistory.info/

http://www.defence.gov.au/army/ahu/index.htm

http://www.defence.gov.au/raaf/

http://www.defence.gov.au/

http://www.anzacsite.gov.au/